Aquila U-8FAILURE LAB / MODEL 0.2
Open what-ifDegraded-system analysis
Compare aggregate system availability and mission effects against the saved Mission 2026-042 baseline.
CONCEPTUAL SIMULATION RESULT
WITHIN CONCEPTUAL CONSTRAINTS
This classification only describes the simplified model constraints below.
PROPULSION AVAILABILITY
8 of 8 motors modeled as available
12345678
POWERED ROTOR AREA19.2 m²
AVAILABLE SHAFT POWER440.0 kW
AVAILABLE STATIC THRUST7,600 N
REQUIRED HOVER THRUST5,886 N
THRUST MARGIN+1,714 N
WORST UTILIZATION BY CHECK
Constraint comparison
Hover shaft power91.3 / 440.0 kWPASS
Hover battery power110.4 / 400.0 kWPASS
Required hover thrust5,886.0 / 7,600.0 NPASS
Calculated takeoff mass600.0 / 600.0 kgPASS
Required shaft power91.3 / 440.0 kWPASS
Required battery power110.4 / 400.0 kWPASS
Required lift coefficient1.2 / 1.5 ratioPASS
Mission energy15.7 / 96.0 kWhPASS
PHASE ENERGY
Baseline vs degraded
VTOL
1.84 → 1.84 kWh
CLIMB
1.72 → 1.72 kWh
CRUISE
10.18 → 10.18 kWh
DESCENT
0.11 → 0.11 kWh
LAND
1.84 → 1.84 kWh
MODEL BOUNDARY
Limitations and assumptions
- Aggregate power and thrust availability only; asymmetric yaw, roll, control allocation, and transient response are not modeled.
- A failed motor removes one powered rotor from induced-power area; drag from the inactive rotor is not modeled.
- Battery energy retention changes capacity while pack mass remains unchanged.
- Battery discharge-power retention is an independent user input; no hidden relationship to energy retention is assumed.
- Results are conceptual estimates and are not suitable for safety, certification, or flight-authorization decisions.
BASELINE INPUT HASH
fnv1a-a78438c9DEGRADED INPUT HASH
fnv1a-a78438c9